Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/iDog with LEDs

iDog with LEDs

thumb|200px|An iDog with LED lights on, this indicates that there is music being played. [[:Image:IDogLights2.JPG|thumb|200px|Version 2 uploaded by Marblewonder. This one only has 3 LED lights on, but is less blurry.]]

Though the article that this image is made for is small, this picture clearly shows the viewer what an iDog is. Also, it shows the iDog in use, as 6 of its 7 LED lights are flashing; this picture is currently used in the iDog article. This is first ever FP nomination. And it is of my own work, so please help me as much as possible by using constructive criticism. =)

• Nominate and support. - _i♥nymarble.wonder^myPhotos 00:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose, a lot of the subject is out of focus and blurry; looks like some of it was camera jitter. Did you use a tripod? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 00:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, the new version has the same depth of field issues as the last version. Only part of the dog is in focus; the far ear is entirely out of focus. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 02:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Yeah, I'm gonna see if I can get some better shots of the dog, with its whole body in focus.--_i♥nymarble.wonder^myPhotos 03:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose focus issues n under-exposed. --antilived ^{T | C | G} 04:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. Robotsintrouble 10:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. This is actually a tricky subject. You have to get a decent exposure, while still shoing the glowing LED's. Use a tripod, and a smaller apperture. Check the white balance. This dog is supposed to look white, but in the picture it is brownish. Try different lighting, maybe daylight with an overcast sky? Might be too bright for the LEDs to show though. --Dschwen 11:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. No "wow" in this bow-wow. ;-) --Janke | Talk 17:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. - Mailer Diablo 19:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose Per above --Fir0002 00:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose per focus and darkness issues as well as the odd angle of the shot which is not ideal in my opinion. Cat-five - talk 09:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Not promoted Raven4x4x 07:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)