Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Young Bhil girl

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2019 at 13:27:39 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:27, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~There's a weird line that looks kind of like film damage on the bottom, across her shirt.~~ It's a stitch. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.5% of all FPs} 16:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question What are our rules on personality rights? For adults and for children? FP needs free licence, but this one says it's not in the public domain. It that OK? The background isn't well chosen, neither is the crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CC-by-SA is considered a sufficiently free licence, isn't it? Not 100% sure about SA. I know there was an issue with dual-licensing GDFL and CC-by-NC, but SA is a lot less restrictive than that. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.5% of all FPs} 18:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For the personality rights, I don't think we need anything else than the current template. The background is the wall of her house, so I can't do anything about it. The crop is chosen to have lead space in the direction she's looking, and use the rule of third. That's how portraits are usually done. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't meaning the wall, but the fabric behind her. And actually portraits, unsurprisingly, are usually portrait orientation, not landscape, but of course it's an artistic choice. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:25, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. Portraits by professional photographers are usually in landscape format. See good examples in c:Category:Wikimedia Foundation staff. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]