Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wrist and hand deeper palmar dissection
Appearance
- Support as nominator --Libertad0 ॐ (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Hi Wilfredor, without reading deeply into the past, it's probably worth mentioning clearly what has changed since the last nom, which failed. If I remember right, it had to do with sourcing? ❄ upstateNYer ❄ 23:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Until referenced. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Own work is a real hand drawn with the help of a Doctor (to identify the parties) --Libertad0 ॐ (talk) 13:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you mean that you had a doctor help you identify the parts. That is good - but we still want at least one verifiable source to back up the diagram. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- WP:ORIGINAL. ZooFari 17:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I am disappointed that the radial artery and other structures are not labelled at the wrist. References should be easy to find. I am uncertain about what the diagram would be used for. It could be a learning aid, but it would not replace diagrams and photographs in an anatomy atlas. Snowman (talk) 13:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 04:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)