Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Town hall in Zwickau

Town hall in Zwickau

Reason: Very intersting picture and it's of high quality.
Articles this image appears in: Zwickau
Creator: Aka

Support as nominator — Bewareofdog 00:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great architectural shot. An even larger resolution would be nice (more shots to stitch!) but this is by far sufficient.--Here T oHelp 00:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although a higher resolution would be nice, it is a good shot overall, with decent detail and not too much noise.--Analogue Kid 01:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture Cacophony 03:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No wow factor, just a facade, just 2MP, and quite a bit oversharpened. --Dschwen 06:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a FYI, Nikon D70 is a 6.1 MP Bleh999 08:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - That may be so, but THIS image has been downsampled to ~2.1MP. ♠ SG →Talk 13:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can't make my mind up here. Backighting, with the sun on the buildings opposite, is nice and arty but bad enc for details and textures. Perspective correction is only just good enough, post-processing in general a little heavy-handed but reasonably ok. I like the very architectural, front-on framing and there's nothing within the frame to complain about, very clean indeed. If it gets promoted, it won't be totally undeserved, is all. Size is fine for this subject, what's wrong with 2MP? mikaul^talk 15:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Heavily oversharpened. Centy – reply• contribs – 20:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great pic but spoiled by over-the-top sharpening - Adrian Pingstone 16:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Pingstone, the image is very down sampled and is a bit unrealisticly saturated to the point of looking fake. I liken it to this which I think is a rather nasty photograph -Fcb981 23:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Dire post-processing (excessive sharpening and saturation), poor lighting. --YFB ¿ 16:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 08:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]