Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Thomas Jefferson Signature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2013 at 15:51:50 (UTC)

OriginalThomas Jefferson’s signature on a check, twice, both as payee and payor. Jefferson wrote this check to himself during the last month of his two-term presidency. Cut-cancelled twice, not affecting the signatures.
Reason
Good EV, high quality example of Thomas Jefferson’s signature on a check.
Articles in which this image appears
Thomas Jefferson
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator
(Image by Godot13)
From the National Numismatic Collection, NMAH, Smithsonian Institution.
Good suggestion, it has been added.--Godot13 (talk) 04:18, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The placement was not entirely random: based on a Commons discussion, I wanted to display Jefferson's autographed signature underneath the infobox placement of the subject's facsimile signature. Thanks for the support. --Godot13 (talk) 04:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If someone could help (fix) the link in my comment above I would be grateful...--Godot13 (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. You have to put "commons" twice: once to get to the project, and once to get to the commons namespace on the project. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated.--Godot13 (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I find that it offers absolutely no EV to the Thomas Jefferson article, which already has a clean sig in the infobox, and in fact would advocate removing it as unnecessary. As to its usage in the article on checks, I see it as being a gallery piece, as it's stacked up in a column with other period checks, and is only on top because it's oldest. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regretful Oppose The historical value of the check is way higher then the EV... I mean, it's not like it was a unique aspect to Thomas J. only, and the article does already have a copy of his signature. Dusty777 01:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I have to agree with the above, the EV is pretty low. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --King of 20:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]