Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Tortoise and the Hare by Arthur Rackham
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2021 at 00:20:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- Looks pretty (that's still the main criterion, right?), Rackham needs representation, all other criteria secondary (but still met)
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Tortoise and the Hare, List of fictional turtles (offensive to British English speakers), Human uses of mammals (seriously, the first one is the only EV)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Artwork/Literary_illustrations
- Creator
- Arthur Rackham
- Support as nominator – Belle (talk) 00:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - Quite soft in full size (upscaled?), barely fulfills size requirement. Also, the facetious caption is quite unusable as such. --Janke | Talk 08:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- What are we using the FPC captions for? Genuine query, I've never seen them used anywhere but in the nominations, but I haven't nominated anything for seven years. ...and if barely fulfilling the size requirement is grounds for objection we should raise the size requirements.Belle (talk) 10:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- My objections were in the order of importance; the softness alone is enough. A good caption suggested here might even be used as such in the Picture of the Day on the main page... --Janke | Talk 14:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- I wasn't dissing your softness objection, I just wanted to know if we had started using the captions for something outside FPC while I was away in case I was risking a spanking for being silly. Belle (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- My objections were in the order of importance; the softness alone is enough. A good caption suggested here might even be used as such in the Picture of the Day on the main page... --Janke | Talk 14:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- What are we using the FPC captions for? Genuine query, I've never seen them used anywhere but in the nominations, but I haven't nominated anything for seven years. ...and if barely fulfilling the size requirement is grounds for objection we should raise the size requirements.Belle (talk) 10:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)