Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Taraxacum officinale clock

Common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) clock

Clean and crisp.

Nominate and support. - drumguy8800 C T 08:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much too shallow DOF, considerably lowers enc. --Janke | Talk 09:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Totally agree with Janke - Adrian Pingstone 09:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Beautiful, but too small DOF. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Yep, the low DOF hurts this pictures enc. --Dschwen 17:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The DOF concerns are just too much. Sharkface217 19:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - DOF, but a lovely shot nonetheless. Try a reshoot with a higher f-number (you might need to use a tripod as you'll need a longer exposure). --YFB ¿ 01:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would have no problem with this shot if only the dandelion was in focus, but not even the entire dandelion is.. --⁪froth^{T C} 15:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support-All that has to be said! Booksworm Talk to me! 15:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. It's a bit blurry around the edges. Ilikefood 17:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. For something this common, a better picture can most definitely be produced. NauticaShad e s 15:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as the dandelion is blurry, and too common, so a dandelion picture needs to be superb to be a featured picture, which this one is not. --RandomOrca2 01:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DOF too shallow, also I would like to see it centred. Terri G 11:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]