Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sunny sky made with photoshop

Sunny sky made with photoshop

I made this image with Photoshop, I didn't take a picture of the sky or anythign like that, just simple filters.

Nominate and support. - mo-- (^Talk | _#info | ) 21:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not encyclopedic, unless a description is added of how it is done, what filters and settings are used - but that's an article, not a picture... --Janke | Talk 22:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This picture is used in the Adobe Photoshop page as an example to show some stuff you can create with photoshop from scratch, anyways I thought what's being looked at is the picture it's self not how it was made,, --mo-- (^Talk | _#info | ) 03:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unless it was created with some revolutionary new filters, this image is nothing notable. --Pharaoh Hound 00:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not FP material - Adrian Pingstone 07:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite odd. On the same day this nomination had been posted, an anonymous user signing as User:Cornell010 replaced the text of the nomination with their own nomination. After Janke's comment the anon then blanked the page, and nobody noticed until now because the blank page didn't show up on the FPC main page. I'll archive it now with the anon's text copied below. Raven4x4x 07:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cornell Pictures

These are some pictures from Cornell University. I was just wondering if any of these pictures are featured worthy.User:Cornell010 09:17, 19 June 2006

Nominate and support.
Comment You've put this in the wrong place. They should be in Wikipedia:Picture_peer_review, not here. If you ask me, no, they're not FPC stuff. --Janke | Talk 14:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See the explanation above. I assume that blanking the page was the anon's way of withdrawing the nomination.

Not promoted Raven4x4x 08:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]