Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Suikoden
Appearance
- Reason
- Incredible scan of an apparently significant work of art--important with respect to both literary/social history and the artist's career. (I have tons more sources about the Suikoden craze that I intend to add to the Water Margin article in the near future.)
- Articles this image appears in
- Water Margin, Utagawa Kuniyoshi
- Creator
- Utagawa Kuniyoshi
- Support as nominator Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment It's certainly a good scan, but it seems a to be lacking a bit of density to me. Fixing it might be tricky without access to the original, as these things tend to be as prone to over-correction as they are to looking a bit "flat". Lets see how it goes. --mikaultalk 10:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting subject, encyclopedic, good scan. Cat-five - talk 08:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Prefer Edit 1 to original. Cat-five - talk 08:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support At this point I am leaning towards the original image at least until someone in the know claims that the colours really are that bright. The edit looks a lot prettier, but the level of detail in the original is just crazy; I'd hate to pass that by unless we're sure the edit is at least more true to the proper hues and shades. Any way we could try a colour correction but keep more of the size/detail? Matt Deres (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- the full resolution scan maybe more true to the original size of the woodcut, however I doubt there is any visible fine detail not present in the downsampled version & the large increase in resources and bandwidth to display such a big image outweigh it's usefulness (unless you are going to use it for printing purposes rather than online viewing) 3000px seems like a good limit for encyclopedia use Thisglad (talk) 12:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support original, oppose edit 1 The original has amazing levels of detail, which the downsampling in edit 1 deletes for no reason that I can see. Also, as Matt Deres said, some verification on what the original looked like would be nice. thegreen J Are you green? 19:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- oppose foot cut off at end, probably incomplete original Thisglad (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Either, Prefer Edit 1 Edit 1 does a wonderful job as far as lighting and brightness goes. This woodblock print showcases the brilliance and sheer wonder of Japanese art. --Sharkface217 03:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer edit 1. —dima/talk/ 02:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer edit 1 - meets all the criteria and has historical value.--Svetovid (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Suikoden.jpg --jjron (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)