Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Studies of Embryos

Support as nominator Durova^Charge! 10:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support de Bivort 00:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Top enc, but would like to see the exposure evened out a bit. It's a bit grainy and oversharpened, too. --Janke | Talk 09:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To the best of my knowledge the original nomination was not sharpened or manipulated in any way. The grain and brightness variations appear to be natural; smudging is visible in the darker areas. Per your feedback I've cleaned up a few artifacts and done a minor adjustment layer. Durova^Charge! 10:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top encyclopedic value trumps minor technical shortcomings. faithless (^speak) 01:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great value to Wikipedia --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Difficult to have the authorization to photograph and great historical value --Luc Viatour (talk) 13:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Showcases his detailed and distinctive drawing style AND his backwards writing (obvious at full resolution). This picture is a definite asset. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrExtreme (talk • contribs) 20:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a famous sketch, it deserves a spot on the front page. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 07:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Da Vinci Studies of Embryos Luc Viatour.jpg MER-C 09:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]