Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shifen waterfall

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 May 2012 at 22:54:49 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Pine^(talk) 22:54, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jkadavoor (talk) 06:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support but the caption is lousy. I hope "According to the Wikipedia article" won't appear in the article. Matthewedwards : Chat 06:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I hadn't noticed that "caption" was replaced by "file description" with this edit. But still, the file description is at its bare minimum and leaves a lot to be desired. There's no geotagging, no real description other than the name of the waterfalls and the town they're in. Matthewedwards : Chat 06:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lotje ツ (talk) 08:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. It's a nice photo but there seems to be quite a lot of posterisation, particularly on the water. Bad post processing? Ðiliff «» (Talk) 16:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has good EV, since no other pictures are in article. No major technical flaws. Dusty777 17:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)\[reply]
Qualified support I like it, but I think it could be even better with some more of the left cropped out, as the darkness there is a little distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the left part because it shows the interesting footbridge. MathewTownsend (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:ShiFengWaterFall_002.jpg --Dusty777 17:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]