Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Renal Corpuscle

Reason: It is an impressive and accurate graphic file with substantial EV.
Articles this image appears in: Kidney, Bowman's capsule, Podocyte and Renal corpuscle
Creator: M.Komorniczak

Support as nominator --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Be aware that if this image becomes FP, the image will lose its Valued picture status. I think it is better as VP, because it has a high educational purpose more than it has the criteria to become a FP. Zoo Fari 19:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since when can a file not be a VP and FP at the same time? A file can be a QI and FP at the same time... --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats only the case with WP:VI, not COM:VI. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in that case I think it will be better off as a VP. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose it needs sources to show verifiability. gren グレン 00:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Gren. Durova^Charge! 03:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, I'm a medical student, so is the creator of the file and according to him...it has been dubble checked by a professor. I don't now if that's enough verifiability though. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment GerardM (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC) I have asked a person knowledgeable if this is good educational material. It is !![reply]
Withdraw It's better off as a VP. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 05:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]