Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Purple osteospermum

Support — Alvesgaspar 21:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support ~~needs an extended caption per new FP criteria. Debivort 22:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)~~ Nice. Debivort 15:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I put an extanded caption.Bewareofdog 23:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Me too... Alvesgaspar 23:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image and sufficient caption.--Here T oHelp 01:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose Beautiful picture, but not very encyclopedic. Yes, flowers are most the important diagnostic feature of flowering plants, but it helps to be able to see other parts, as in the oft-quoted cut lemon shot. In the case of pictures to identify plants, I think we should insist on foliage, although some way to include roots and seeds would be superb. Also, I'm not a big fan of the pale, slightly washed out lower and left petals, especially in the larger versions. Enuja 07:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The over-bright petals on the left spoil it for me - Adrian Pingstone 08:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per reasons stated above. --Mad Max 04:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose as per Enuja. -- Balster neb 17:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 07:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]