Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Port Isaac

Port Isaac

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2011 at 15:57:32 (UTC)

Reason: Beautiful, detailed, encyclopedic.
Articles in which this image appears: Port Isaac
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator: Jfitch

Support as nominator --Jujutacular ^talk 15:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like it, I'd like to visit this place. But there's something funky going on in the water in front of the left most boat. Also up the top, quite far to the left some power lines seem to disappear into some blown sky or something. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Both are too insignificant for me to reconsider (particularly the power lines), but I'll understand if that keeps you from supporting. I'll leave a note on Jfitch's talk page, but they have mostly been inactive as of late. Jujutacular ^talk 23:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to many things combined, not very sharp focus, overcast sky, strange blurry spot in the water as pointed out above, and the very distracting out of focus plant in the bottom right foreground. — raeky t 20:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, and because the crop at left seems unsatisfying. --Avenue (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as far as I can tell it meets criteria 1-8 of being a featured picture. It captures the bay and pier as only a panoramic shot could do, and is instantly recognisable to a fan of Doc Martin.TehGrauniad (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support I like this picture. It is huge, and if it had been reduced slightly before nomination, a lot of the complaints here would not have come up as any minor flaws would probably disappear with a slight reduction. – SMasters (talk) 01:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I think the lighting is not adequate. But above all, I that element on the foreground (right, bottom corner) is very distracting. --Murdockcrc (talk) 19:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Maedin\^talk 18:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]