Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Orbital bones
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 January 2015 at 00:01 UTC
- Reason
- Meets criteria 1, 3, 4 and 5. Is a very high quality (#1). Although image is small this is a technically difficult or otherwise unique image (#2), definitely among our best work (#3). It has a free license (#4) and adding it to articles adds significantly to their encyclopedic value (#5)
- Articles in which this image appears
- Orbit (anatomy)
- FP category for this image
- Diagrams, drawings, and maps
- Creator
- Je at uwo
- Support as nominator – Tom (LT) (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Too small, makes very little sense without labels or whatnot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- The colour-coding is explained in the caption in the article. For me, though, it is still a bit confusing. I don't immediately know which of the four (five?) blue/green colours is "aqua" or "teal", for example, and when I count the different colours in the image there seem to be more than the eight that are explained. The diagram also does not handle depth very clearly, in my opinion. 109.152.146.134 (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hence why labels would work better on the image. It's got few enough things being labeled for that to work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- The colour-coding is explained in the caption in the article. For me, though, it is still a bit confusing. I don't immediately know which of the four (five?) blue/green colours is "aqua" or "teal", for example, and when I count the different colours in the image there seem to be more than the eight that are explained. The diagram also does not handle depth very clearly, in my opinion. 109.152.146.134 (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Crisco 1492. gazhiley 11:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose — Per foregoing. Sca (talk) 13:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Crisco 1492. APK whisper in my ear 01:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - EV is reduced because of the confusing colors, and this is definitely not one of the best images on Wikipedia --DUCK404 a (talk) 19:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- I would also suggest a speedy close for the reasons above --DUCK404 a (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- In light of the opposes I withdraw this proposal. --Tom (LT) (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 23:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)