Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Night view of Safdarjung Tomb
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 May 2023 at 19:48:24 (UTC)
- Reason
- featured unanimously on commons, is also an excellent image of the tomb’s view at night
- Articles in which this image appears
- Tomb of Safdar Jang
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Arjunfotografer
- Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Daytime view is more encyclopaedic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are about three dozen FPs of illuminated buildings at night, dawn, or dusk in the Architecture gallery. UnpetitproleX (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with Charles. Nighttime reflective building images generally strike me as gimmicky. -- Sca (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp, UnpetitproleX, and Sca: My thought is that they can make an otherwise kind of standard building look nicer, "edit out" ugly or distracting context, and draw eyes to the building. But the lead image of the article, while not perfect in any way, shows that there's a perfectly good background available during the day, indeed, a whole complex around it that appears to be a very intentional complex and thus encyclopedic. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.4% of all FPs. 16:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with Charles. Nighttime reflective building images generally strike me as gimmicky. -- Sca (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are about three dozen FPs of illuminated buildings at night, dawn, or dusk in the Architecture gallery. UnpetitproleX (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 04:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose – The blacks are too black and underexposed. Exposure bracketing or a brighter time in the evening would be a big improvement. Bammesk (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)