Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nepali woman

Nepali woman

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 06:56:56 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality portrait; high EV, especially for Wrinkle; Commons FP
Articles in which this image appears: Wrinkle, Demographics of Nepal
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
Creator: travelwayoflife

Support as nominator --—Bruce1ee^talk 06:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, applicable for usage on multiple articles, educational, encyclopedic, high value and high quality. — Cirt (talk) 16:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I'm getting a strong sense that this has had an unnatural level of post processing, in particular that kitschy bleach bypass type effect. It weakens the EV. JJ Harrison (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This kind of photo would always be move valuable with more information, as its limited, not terribly helpful use in articles demonstrates. It would be more valuable in wrinkle if her age were known, more valuable in Demographics of Nepal (and potentially other articles) if her ethnicity were known. Chick Bowen 01:46, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately the photographer did not publish this information here, probably because it was not known. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Manang is not ethnically heterogeneous. People from manag are called nyeshang or manang-bas; they speak their own language, Manang language, and are adherents of Bon. Several volumes have been published on the region and are likely to contain further information if required. Also note that for the purposes of the 2001 Nepal census, Bonpo were lumped with buddhists; fwiw, by this classification, only 3 of the 515 people in the village administration area were *not* "bouddha" in religious orientation; these three were Hindu, which we can exclude with a high degree of certainty for the woman depicted. Samsara (FA • FP) 13:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]