Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mourne Mountains

Self-nom. Added it because the other pictures of this iconic mountain range do not give any sort of perspective.

Self-nom and support. - Mark83 20:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support.Clear at high resolution, good panoramic view.--Dakota ~ ε 21:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Actually, I think this is a bit blurry at its full size. If someone could sharpen it then I'd support it. -JPM 22:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why do we continually get pics here that are clearly sloping? - Adrian Pingstone 22:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Straightened version uploaded. Mark83 22:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment If it is only a simple correction, you can just upload the edit over the original. We only really need to see edits if they differ significantly. ~MDD 46 96 04:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Looks like any other mountain to me. enochlau (talk) 06:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The mountain doesn't look that good to me. Maybe if the picture was closer it could give some height to the mountain. --Ali K 13:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not striking. Alr 17:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The mountain is the subject of interest but represents only about 5% of the image surface. Glaurung 07:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The title makes it clear it is the mountain range which is the subject of the image. However even then probably still too small. Mark83 12:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the mountain range, but I agree its closer to 10% than 5%, but still too small. Glaurung 07:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 08:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]