Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Morning fog at Golden Gate Bridge
- Reason
- Uncommon and beautiful view of the GGB. Image is already a FP in Commons.
- Articles this image appears in
- fog, Golden Gate Bridge
- Creator
- Grombo
- Nominator
- Alvesgaspar
- Support — Alvesgaspar 09:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Support Maybe a bit over sharpened and noise on the high side but still very stunning and illustrates the subject in both articles very well. --antilivedT | C | G 10:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uncommon, eh? The composition is a bit better than my version of the same subject.
weak support--Dschwen(A) 12:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)- Mh, detail shots can be interesting and enc, but on second thought I don't see how the pic augments my knowledge of the GGB. --Dschwen
(A) 14:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- The golden gate bridge spends a good amount of time wrapped in fog. I could also see this image appearing on the article about fog itself. -Fcb981 00:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose It's sort of encyclopedic but i love to see one of the archways of the bridge before fog covers it all. --Arad 12:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose The bridge doesn't go enough towards the right end of the picture. If you would have been more to the left, it might be a weak support.Althepal 18:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)~
- Support Amazingly Beautiful picture Booksworm Talk to me! 10:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose not the best representation of fog or the Golden Gate Bridge. It's a fairly good picture, but it's really not great for any article... gren グレン 10:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - Just beautiful... Towsonu2003 06:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Good FP for Commons, bad choice for Wikipedia. mstroeck 08:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate on that, please? - Alvesgaspar 08:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure he means what I do above. This doesn't represent the Golden Gate Bridge very well and if we had an article called Part of the Golden Gate Bridge in fog then it would be good there. But, since he seems to like the picture he thinks it could become an FP on the commons because there it doesn't need to correspond to an article. gren グレン 10:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- And I agree. It's not perfect for FP in WP. --Arad 03:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure he means what I do above. This doesn't represent the Golden Gate Bridge very well and if we had an article called Part of the Golden Gate Bridge in fog then it would be good there. But, since he seems to like the picture he thinks it could become an FP on the commons because there it doesn't need to correspond to an article. gren グレン 10:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate on that, please? - Alvesgaspar 08:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 01:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)