Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Misty morning

Misty Morning

Very nice photos showing the beauty of mist

( + ) Support Choice 2. --Fir0002 July 6, 2005 01:17 (UTC)
Choice 2 is the nicer of the two. Phoenix2 6 July 2005 21:27 (UTC)

Yeah I like it better too --Fir0002 July 7, 2005 08:41 (UTC)

Support second. What engaging pictures you take! Sango 123 July 7, 2005 21:07 (UTC)
Support for the first one. Nice pictures. -- WB July 8, 2005 07:50 (UTC)
Support either one, preference for the first one -- Chris 73 Talk 09:29, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Fascinating details of clouds. I prefer the first to the second, but the second's good too. Enochlau 13:05, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support either, marvellous pics - Adrian Pingstone 16:27, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. 1st one. --Silversmith Hewwo 16:53, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Choice 1. Housing adds the human element. --Uris 01:06, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Choice 2. Excellent picture (my new wallpaper ;)). Don't care for the house in choice 1 too much. Sortan 23:04, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support with a preference for 1. Although since they are quite similar, I don't think we need both on the mist page. -- Solipsist 06:47, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support first one, slightly less of a support, but still a support, for the second one. The first one with the houses provides a "totality" perspective with it, plus how the houses look so sleepy in the face of the mists. -- Natalinasmpf 05:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I just had an idea, I'm wondering if it could possibly make for a separate candidate, well if it gets done - if someone can engineer the image to have an army (I'm thinking one from the 1800's, Civil War, Crimean, or Napoleonic might do) looking over the hill, with perhaps a banner fluttering (and small enough for artifacts to be very very obscure), it would make for quite a dramatic effect. Small enough not to detract from the photo, and would be quite subtle (easy to spot, but when the eyes catch it gasps)....and integrated with the clouds and mist it would make quite an image. But of course, that's just a crazy idea....-- Natalinasmpf 06:33, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Misty morning02.jpg +11 / -0 Almost evenly split between two, I'll choose to promote #1 -- Solipsist 21:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]