Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lychee
Appearance
Note: Many of the early oppose votes were due to size. However, a higher resolution version was uploaded. Older voters, please update your votes accordingly.
- Nominate and support. - Tdxiang 03:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Oppose. This is too small. Please familiarize yourself with WP:WIAFP. NauticaShades 09:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support. High-res version is much better. NauticaShades 20:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose As Nautica says the pic is too small to be considered, it's only 640 pixels wide, we need at least 1000 - Adrian Pingstone 09:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice composition, if it were 3x size and res it would be a candidate. --Bridgecross 15:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support nice composition and color, stands out niceley -dafodil- 3:40, 15 October 2006 (MDT)
- Oppose
Very nice image, but as noted above, it's just too small. Severnjc 22:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Size is fixed, but the new size brings out the tremendous amount of grain, particularly on the leaves. No change to my vote. Severnjc 03:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC) - Support. I've replaced the 640 pixel version by the 300 dpi copy from the source (USDA web page).
- Comment - The image meta data says "(2790x1851, 947 KB)" but it only loads at 640. I like the image a lot and would like to see a large version. Debivort 06:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is weird. The preview version on the image page is smaller than the full resolution. How is that possible? NauticaShades 11:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- The "high res" version is not only smaller than the preview version: it is brighter and differently cropped, too. Perhaps re-uploading the high res version would help? --KFP (talk | contribs) 13:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- It seems to work now. For me, anyway. NauticaShades 20:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- The "high res" version is not only smaller than the preview version: it is brighter and differently cropped, too. Perhaps re-uploading the high res version would help? --KFP (talk | contribs) 13:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is weird. The preview version on the image page is smaller than the full resolution. How is that possible? NauticaShades 11:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - The image meta data says "(2790x1851, 947 KB)" but it only loads at 640. I like the image a lot and would like to see a large version. Debivort 06:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support This is a great picture! Please re-upload it so we can make it a Featured Picture. :] Jellocube27 14:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - I can see the full version now, and like it a lot, except for the graininess on the leaves, particularly on the left. What is the group-think about down-sampling these days? Debivort 00:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Apart from noise and soft focus (which could be resolved by downsampling, but please don't, the mediawiki software already does it for us) I think the exposure is too crass, and the image all in all is a bit too dark. --Dschwen 17:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support This shows everything about fruit Lychee and It would be better like size 640 pixel. Daniel5127 (Talk) 03:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too dark. howcheng {chat} 17:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Good picture but not extraordinary. - Alvesgaspar 09:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Unexceptional, and too much noise. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose as per above. -- CountdownCrispy ( ? 15:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- It's a good subject, but it's just too dark. Would probably support a lighter version. tiZom(2¢) 14:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Just don't think it's FP material.--DaveOinSF 06:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted. howcheng {chat} 15:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)