Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Koppie foam grasshopper nymph (2)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2022 at 16:18:34 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. These should probably be a small set, but taking this as it is.... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 19:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Adam Cuerden. --Tagooty (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I don't see the EV. The article says nothing about nymph, reproduction, etc., and why is it in infobox. Bammesk (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find a learned article to add anything about the nymph. Hence the image itself is so important. I added it to infobox as, when you come across these insects like I did, you naturally assume they are two diferent grasshoppers. At that time, Wikipedia was of no help. It is now, which is what we should be all about: sharing knowledge to improve the encyclopaedia. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 17:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Koppie foam grasshopper (Dictyophorus spumans spumans) nymph.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]