Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Joan of Arc statue, Notre Dame

Joan of Arc statue, Notre Dame

It's a pretty nice image overall, high resolution, no major problems (as far as I can see, but then again I'm not a professional photographer). It's in the Notre Dame de Paris article.

Nominate and support. - RyGuy17 00:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support INAGA, but it might look even better lightened up a bit. -Ravedave 01:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - the high-res pic seems to lose a bit of quality from JPEG compression. -- P199 01:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - at an eigth of a second it shouldn't be nearly this noisy.--Deglr6328 02:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm, like I said before I don't know what you mean by that, "noisy"? RyGuy17 06:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - The sensor was set to too sensitive a mode (or just is a low quality sensor) and there is a lot of random colored fuzz throughout the image as a result of random thermal fluctuations which produce residual anomalous charge in individual pixels and thus lower the overall signal to noise ratio in the CCD chip. It ruins the image I'm afraid. Some of the reduction in quality is also due to compression. You can filter it but it will suffer some blurring.[1]--Deglr6328 09:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very good low tone image with great lighting, noise acceptable considering the long exposure and the age of the camera (G1!). --antilived ^{T | C} 05:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I like it still. Its not that noisy. psch e mp | talk 05:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice picture! Wat da moe 07:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~I don't know if I have to vote "Suport" or "Oppose", but I wanna with stay the picture. PS: I don't know very english. --Thiago90ap 07:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)~~ I make mistake[reply]
Support--Thiago90ap 03:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Manages to present detail in a very interesting way. I'd love to see a little more light on the feet, but that's not really an important part. Staxringold 06:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Full out support. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Could be sharper on the lower half, but as it is, wonderful. --Golbez 06:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this pic despite a few minor faults - Adrian Pingstone 12:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I rather like this one. --Lewk_of_S e rthic _contrib ^talk 19:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Joan of Arc-Notre Dame.jpg --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 05:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]