Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jellyfish

Jellyfish

Add your reasons for nominating it here; say what article it appears in, and who created the image.

Nominate and support. - Taida 23:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've taken the liberty to remove the timestamp from the image.--Eloquence * 01:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not used anywhere. -Ravedave 02:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The tentiacles are cut off. Jellyfish are best photographed against black, it brings out more detail and makes them look more vibrant. Also, I don't like the lighting. --Pharaoh Hound 16:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment maybe with some creative cropping the cut off tentacles would be less of a problem? It's bad having so much space above and below, but then cutting off to the sides though. Agree about the blue - maybe some touching up could make that less offensive, but still - don't think it's going to get there. Stevage 19:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd want to see more of the tentacles (how far do they stretch?) - - Adrian Pingstone 20:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not in an article. --Enano275 05:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not too keen on the cropping/bg either. Also the focus is a bit off and there are white dots everywhere. --Fir0002 www 11:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. JPEG compression artifacts and lots of speckels. Perhaps this was a scanned image? Plus the composition is lacking. howch e ng {chat} 19:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I really don't like the background, and there are a fair number of artefacts. The white dots aren't that pretty either. Also, doesn't appear to be used in any articles. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 11:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Mikeo 18:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]