Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hibiscus schizopetalus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2012 at 16:12:00 (UTC)

Reason: Brings out all the features of the flower; petals and stamens visible clearly; no background distraction. Meets FPC criteria.
Articles in which this image appears: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibiscus_schizopetalus
FP category for this image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: User:Kallidaimaniac

Support as nominator --Hari Krishnan 16:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Oppose The red/pink hue seems severely over-saturated. This coloring differs pretty sharply from the lead image in the article, which has a much more subdued pink. Jujutacular (talk) 02:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Over-saturation corrected. Kallidaimaniac (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nice species. Brandmeister^talk 11:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hardly any details such that it look like a painting --Muhammad(talk) 06:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's very poor in quality in comparison to say File:Hibiscus schizopetalus (Botanischer Garten TU Darmstadt).jpg, plus it's in a gallery, which is against criteria so it couldn't be promoted because of that... the article is a stub and probably over illustrated with two pictures of the flower? The one in the infobox is the superior flower image of the two options. — raeky t 11:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Julia\^talk 20:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]