Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Donald Pleasence
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2011 at 13:48:57 (UTC)
- Reason
- A very nice portrait from the early seventies- very much irreplaceable, as the subject died in '95. Massive resolution and a well-documented free license.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Donald Pleasence
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Allan warren
- Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 13:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose for now I had been eying this photo myself, but I don't think it's ready for primetime yet--lots of dust and scratches. I had been meaning to restore it myself, but GIMP crashed on me after a good deal of work and I got discouraged... maybe someone else can take this on? Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support I am allowed to vote for myself right?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support: Pleasence was one of the most prolific character actors from the 60's until his death in the 90's. His characters were often highly intelligent and I think the pensive expression in this portrait demonstrates this very well. I agree partially with Calliopejen1 in the current resolution exposes the defects in the original film, perhaps a smaller version would be better since we don't need to see every pore.--RDBury (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- PS: The high resolution also brings out some depth of field issues, also invisible at the resolutions most people will be viewing it.--RDBury (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support love the low DOF. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support As per nom. SMasters (talk) 06:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Wonderful portrait, but I regretfully agree with Calliopejen1. I would probably support a smaller version, if no one has time for a thorough restoration. --Avenue (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose: Needs clean-up work and some headroom. Otherwise very nice. Maedin\talk 23:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)