Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dome of Yusuf

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2013 at 03:07:04 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Godot13 (talk) 03:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't find anything to fault in this picture. Mattximus (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Originally I thought the straight on view is best as that's how it seemed visitors would approach it, but seeing the slightly angled view below, I've withdrawn my support. Mattximus (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice... Godhulii 1985 (talk) 09:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Ok with alt-1 also. Godhulii 1985 (talk) 15:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Straight-on view combined with this view in shadow means it is hard to see any depth. File:Jerusalem-2013-Temple Mount-Dome of Yusuf 01.jpg is much better and I'd support that at FP and replacement in the article. I would encourage you, however, to export as sRGB jpg rather than AdobeRGB, as the former is more suitable for the web and the latter only suitable for sending to a print shop. Colin°^Talk 11:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This viewpoint is very poor for illustrating the subject. The other one you link to is miles better. 86.160.217.227 (talk) 17:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ALT.1 added. I will figure out the sRGB vs AdobeRGB difference and update/overwrite the present ALT.1 in the sRGB format as soon as possible. Thank you Mattximus, Godhulii 1985, and Colin for your prior votes. -Godot13 (talk) 20:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt provided it goes (and stays) in the article. Colin°^Talk 10:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]