Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Crocodylus acutus

Reason: This file is currently used at American Crocodile and is remarkably clear and detailed in its portrayal of the crocodile. The clarity of the scales and outer skin adds to this picture's credit, and the quality of the image is in no way diminished at high resolution.
Articles this image appears in: American crocodile
Creator: Tomás Castelazo

Support as co-nominator -- PeterSymonds (talk) 00:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support as co-nominator --tomascastelazo (talk) 06:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Durova^Charge! 22:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Synergy 00:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Issues with Chromatic aberration. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 14:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator.--mbz1 (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - Looks good overall, but that wooden post in the bottom-center is a bit distracting. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This isn't FP quality. The lighting is bad. And unless my eyes are fooling me (it's 2:35 AM), there are problems with artifacts and chromatic aberration. Makeemlighter (talk) 06:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure what Chromatic Aberration means, but I find the bluriness of the image, especially once you look past the head, distracting... Shame though, as the detail of the skin in the focused part is excellent... Gazhiley (talk) 10:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See Chromatic aberration for info on that. It's in the tail area of this image. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 20:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose As per Gazhiley, shame really it's a nice/scary composition. Terri G (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Gazhiley. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 02:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]