Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago rat hole

Chicago rat hole

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 12:15:46 (UTC)

Reason: Chicago rat hole
Articles in which this image appears: Chicago rat hole
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Other
Creator: Winslow Dumaine

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 12:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. Boot tip distracting. – Sca (talk) 15:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the original photo, right? So the EV would seem to derive not from its being a photo of the hole--since I agree with Sca that's it not great photography, though I don't know what the best techniques are for photographing a hole--but its being the starting point of a meme. Since so few meme images have been properly licensed, I'm not sure we've had occasion to consider what might make them featurable, have we? blameless 23:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If an image meets the FP criteria and does a good job of depicting/enhancing/contributing to the subject of the article(s), that should be sufficient I think, or that's how I think of it. Of course some images are a lot more than just sufficient. Bammesk (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, though I would recommend categorizing in Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others as the photograph has notability as a photograph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a very poor composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - poor composition. MER-C 11:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - same reason mentioned by MER-C Wcamp9 (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]