Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Camp Camp
Appearance
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2024 at 17:13:25 (UTC)
- Reason
- The full first episode of a notable animated series, released by its studio under Creative Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Camp Camp, Rooster Teeth, Adult animation
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
- Creator
- Rooster Teeth
- Support as nominator – Di (they-them) (talk) 17:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose until copyright status clarified - hardly in public domain? (Also, I'm not a fan of this style of animation - "illustrated radio". Where can you find the true art of animation (not illustration) nowadays? --Janke | Talk 08:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- The copyright status doesn't need to be clarified, it was released under CCBY by Rooster Teeth. Di (they-them) (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- About the wording, not everything has to be in "public domain". Placing a request at Commons:Help desk can get the CC tag reviewed in a day or two. Also, on the file page, the sourced archive.org link [1] is there as a license backup. Bammesk (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- The copyright status doesn't need to be clarified, it was released under CCBY by Rooster Teeth. Di (they-them) (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support as representative of the series. I have confirmed a CC-BY license on YouTube exists at the time of this datestamp. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- My concern was because the file page still says "This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid." --Janke | Talk 19:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- If I had the reviewer tag, I'd mark it. Unfortunately, I don't, and Commons seems to take several months for reviews like this. We can work independently of them for FP, though I agree that it shouldn't be on the MP while it's marked as unreviewed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- My concern was because the file page still says "This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid." --Janke | Talk 19:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Simplistic animation of scant EV. Doesn't meet Criterion 3, IMO.– Sca (talk) 14:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan has checked the source YouTube link and indeed it is licensed under CC-BY. Sadly, Vulcan is not a licence reviewer so Vulcan cannot mark the licence verification.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - The license on Commons has now been reviewed by User:Queen of Hearts, so that should alleviate that concern that was previously brought up by @Janke:. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)