Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Burning of the Euromaidan headquarters
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2014 at 17:50:27 (UTC)
- Reason
- We're lucky to have some excellent photojournalism coming out of the Ukraine just now. This deserves recognition, and, while there are numerous photographs deserving consideration, I think this would make a good start. Any imperfections can be waived as they're irreplaceable.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Both are in February 2014 Euromaidan riots. Image 1 additionally appears in 2014 in Ukraine and 2014 in Europe
- FP category for this image
- Not quite sure. One of the History subcategories, certainly, either Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/History/War or Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- User:Amakuha
- Just a little background: this building witnessed all the recent major fights for independence of Ukraine: Revolution on Granite, Orange Revolution and Euromaidan. So seeing this building burnt down marks new age in history of Ukraine.
- The photos were shot when it was unclear whether there would be shooting on Maidan Nezalezhnosti. Luckily, it was mostly quiet at that time.
- On the other hand, I don't consider these pictures to be of high quality neither. But thanks for nomination! --ΑΜακυχα Θ 22:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support both (set) as nominator --Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support as timely & dramatic. Sca (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support both - I have some reservations, of course, but unless something better comes out I doubt there's gonna be much we can do about the quality. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak support image 1, Oppose image 2 Both of them have quality issues, but while the first one has merits in depicting the event, the second one, I feel, does not. It's just a burning building, and there's not enough else in the image to serve as proper context. I will say that I wish File:Protesters throwing pieces of paving during and metal tubes at riot police during clashes at Bankova str, Kiev, Ukraine. December 1, 2013.jpg was of better quality, because as an image I feel it has impact. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 01:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- weak support both This is a bit recent so maybe we should wait for it to settle.--Theparties (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support both as noted above, almost irreplaceable --Երևանցի talk 17:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support top, Oppose bottom. The latter really doesn't add much and loses much of the context, would end up being rather confusing if separated from the first. Not a good standalone Featured picture. Mattximus (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support both - I prefer the top one more. ///EuroCarGT 03:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Image 1, gives a wider perspective on what's going on and how it looks like. Brandmeistertalk 21:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoted File:Euromaidan_in_Kiev_2014-02-19_12-06.jpg Armbrust The Homunculus 17:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Promoted File:Euromaidan_in_Kiev_2014-02-19_10-22.jpg Armbrust The Homunculus 17:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)