Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bryce Canyon Hoodoos Amphitheater
Appearance
- Reason
- I think it is a great picture of the Bryce Canyon Amphitheater.
- Articles this image appears in
- Bryce Canyon National Park and Hoodoo (geology)
- Creator
- Digon3
- Nominator
- Digon3
- Support — Digon3 16:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral Very nice composition; however I am left a little unsatisfied. Seems a little washed out, maybe a little grainy too. Nice shot, I just don't think it is FP material. ~ Arjun 02:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean by washed out? --Digon3 15:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Washed out usually means it is lacking in contrast. I think Arjun01 was refering to the same issue as me which is that it is slightly overexposed. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 16:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Diliff; that was the word I was looking for. ~ Arjun 04:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- So to improve it, I should increase contrast and darken it a bit? --Digon3 16:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- It lacks detail which cannot be recovered by increasing contrast. By the way did you perform any kind of post-processing on this version, the sky has weird looking patches. --Dschwen(A) 15:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I noticed, you uploaded a new version over the original(?) four days ago. I don't quite get why you did that. The edit is no improvement at all, but introduces weird artifacts and slightly unnatural colors. --Dschwen(A) 15:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I reverted it back. --70.153.199.145 19:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- It lacks detail which cannot be recovered by increasing contrast. By the way did you perform any kind of post-processing on this version, the sky has weird looking patches. --Dschwen(A) 15:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Washed out usually means it is lacking in contrast. I think Arjun01 was refering to the same issue as me which is that it is slightly overexposed. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 16:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. A little overexposed and soft. Not a bad composition but this is such a well-photographed location I think we can expect more. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 08:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose The whole thing is fairly blury.
Not promoted Raven4x4x 07:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)