Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bengal Tiger

Reason: clear well focused and it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured.
Articles this image appears in: tiger
Creator: Indianhilbilly

Support as nominator --Alokprasad84 (talk) 08:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unsharp, low resolution (and only depicts part of the animal). Pstuart84 Talk 18:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral- An excellent image, but the whole animal should appear, not just the upper torso. ~Meldshal42_{Hit me}^{What I've Done} 19:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support-Excellent image showing facial details in closeup. Look at the clarity around eyes and mustaches. Good lighting and no special effects. --gppande «talk» 08:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Pstuart84. Mfield (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose regretfully. I don't know what it is about this image, it's not out of focus, but it's not quite in focus either. Wish is was, 'cause it's a great pose. Clegs (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, regretfully. Good lighting, good pose, and I have gotten over my distaste for head-only animal portraits. But the focus isn't quite up to the standards of other FP animal portraits: , , , for example.
Oppose The image is a bit thin, and after seeing this in comparison, I'm afraid I can't support. Spencer^T♦^C 22:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It meets the requirements, but the resolution is STILL an issue. I would love to see this at higher resolution. Crassic! (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]