Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bald Eagle Portrait

Bald Eagle Portrait

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 May 2012 at 19:00:02 (UTC)

Reason: High quality close up head shot.
Articles in which this image appears: Bald Eagle
FP category for this image: Animals/Birds
Creator: User:Saffron Blaze

Support as nominator --Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Love it Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jkadavoor (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This should potentially, if it wins, replace File:Bald.eagle.closeup.arp-sh.750pix.jpg which isn't used in any really relevant articles anymore. — raeky t 09:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very good. Clegs (^{engage in rational discourse}) 13:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Support~~ Weak Oppose The picture without a doubt, fits the criteria. I am a little concerned over the encyclopedic value... Bald Eagle already has 10+ pictures for a relatively short article, and this picture doesn't really contribute that much more then the other pictures... I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't think it really passes as far as the EV goes. Dusty777 18:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? I personally find it a rather long article, but I agree with you. Pteronura brasiliensis 16:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd say the lead article of Bald Eagle should be a FP, if anything. Also the image doesn't really strike me as much as some of the other that article has. Pteronura brasiliensis 16:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find it the most striking image in the Bald Eagle article. Sanyambahga (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The most striking picture is File:Bald.eagle.closeup.arp-sh.750pix.jpg. But I oppose both because none show the full bird.--GoP _T ^C _N 11:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bald Eagle Portrait.jpg --Jujutacular (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]