Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Anagallis monelli
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 May 2012 at 13:26:20 (UTC)
- Reason
- Maybe not the most striking image, but has good EV: clean crop, sharp, high resolution, satisfying quality overall, and background isn't distracting
- Articles in which this image appears
- Anagallis monelli
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
- Creator
- Lycaon
- Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 13:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment the image has strong encyclopedic potential, but the blue pimpernel article doesn't seem to mention the orange form so currently its encyclopedic value is debatable and I cannot support it until the article is expanded. Purpy Pupple (talk) 06:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- I've add to the article information about color variants of this flower, including info about the orange form. BTW, I'd be glad if someone can check if the addition was done correctly, because I don't have much experience in writing and expanding articles in English. Specifically, I'm not sure the references to scientific articles were done correctly. Tomer T (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Checked. All good. Julia\talk 19:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Purpy Pupple (talk) 00:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- I've add to the article information about color variants of this flower, including info about the orange form. BTW, I'd be glad if someone can check if the addition was done correctly, because I don't have much experience in writing and expanding articles in English. Specifically, I'm not sure the references to scientific articles were done correctly. Tomer T (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support It all seems to check out to me. JJ Harrison (talk) 00:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support-- Passes all the checkmarks for me Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Support- The focus is a bit too spread out, but otherwise good. Gupdoo3 (talk) 16:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Weak support—technical quality is not as high as it could/should be, but it definitely checks out with the other criteria, especially it is a great illustration of the subject for encyclopedic purposes. —Ynhockey (Talk) 10:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Lysimachia monelli (habitus).jpg --Dusty777 22:52, 5 May 2012 (UTC)