Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Alice Paul

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016 at 19:18:18 (UTC)

Reason: It's a really impressively detailed image; Harris & Ewing would later become the largest photographic studio in the United States, and with pictures like this, it's not hard to see why. #10wikicommonsdays Day 3
Articles in which this image appears: Alice Paul et al.
FP category for this image: One could argue a few places, but as she was also head of the National Woman's Party, Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political seems reasonable.
Creator: Harris & Ewing, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Pretty great photo for 1915. Also, how about that hat? Kaldari (talk) 04:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's some uncanny white glow from her dress, maybe the highlights can be toned down a bit. Brandmeister^talk 13:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It is on the original too [1] (scanned from a negative [2]). Is the original burned to enhance lighting/contrast, or is it a lens effect, or ...? It is uncanny, although I do Support as is, given photo's age and EV (and the hat of course). Bammesk (talk) 13:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is with me turning the highlights down a bit to bring out the detail. I think it's reflecting light a bit. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Alice Paul (1915) by Harris & Ewing.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]