Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of premature obituaries/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 23:06, 31 March 2009 [1].
- notified: WikiProject Journalism, WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Sociology and Bfinn.
This one showed up in the Clean up listing and when I looked at it, I discovered a number of sourcing violations.
Some examples:
- It cites wikipedia pages at least five times.
- There are two citation needed tags, one of which has been there since October 2008 and there are a number of uncited statements, such as real death dates.
- Several completely unsourced entries, including Sean Connery, Kevin Stoney and Heinz Wolff.
- A lot of improperly formatted citation templates.
- Several questionable sources, including:
- abbaannual.com
- Regrettheerror.com
- Amazon.com
- Jesuismort.com
- about.com
- "See references in John Darwin disappearance case."
- Prairieghosts.com
- Stiffs.com
- Some scope problems too, if you are going to include NN people who don't have pages, like Feliberto Carrasco or Mildred C. Clarke, doesn't that open up a huge can of worms?
- Speaking of wikipedia pages, is someone vandalizing a page really considered an obituary? And I've seen many cases of people doing that. Doesn't having a page that lists these things just glorify and encourage people to do it?
- I'm also curious about some of these entries, like Vince McMahon. That was a storyline death, like someone's character being killed in a TV sjow, and I don't think any news sources took it seriously and actually published an obituary for him.
Some of these issues are minor and easily fixable, but there are a lot of them. -- Scorpion0422 23:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did some cleanup already, I agree with most of the statements, and it seemed like the FLC passed without much commenting a year ago. I'll fix the rest of the concerns in the upcoming days. Secret account 14:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I removed many of the sources that seemed questionable with the exception of regrettheerror.com, which is a reliable source for media errors, and covers all errors major news media makes (even if it's a little bloggy). I removed a few of the nn (others should have articles, as they are well known and even mentioned in books), I took care of the wikipedia vandalism obituarys, but I still have more work to do. Secret account 21:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I stumbled across this when going through the latest cleanup listings. I managed to replace one {{fact}} tag but was unable to verify the other. The comprehensiveness issue will always be a struggle with this list, but even without that difficulty, when citations are referencing an IMDb message board I think it becomes time to delist. Rambo's Revenge (How am I doing?) 15:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sad to see this one gone since this is one of the most interesting FLs, but it should be delist per sourcing issue.—Chris! ct 06:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I don't think the sourcing issues can be resolved in the time allotted here. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.