Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Vancouver Canucks captains/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by IMatthew 00:05, 24 August 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: WikiProject Ice Hockey, WikiProject Vancouver. The primary contributor (SRE.K.A.L.24) is already aware.
I am nominating this for featured list removal because this list fails criterion 3b. Every bit of information in this list is in List of Vancouver Canucks players, making this a redundant content fork. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to notify me. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 19:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, fails 3b. Theleftorium 19:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment How is every bit of information in this list in the other list? The entire lead talks about captains of the team, their relevance etc etc. Which is all different than what is in the other article? I agree it could probably be merged to the other article however. I just wanted to point out that the nom statement isn't that accurate. -Djsasso (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I meant to say that the lead of the other article should have that information. List of Vancouver Canucks players is not quite up to current standards, and more info about the captains should be added to its lead. The second paragraph is an overview of what a captain is; I don't think all of the info there is vital. The third paragraph is a summary of the list, and is not terribly important. List of Chicago Blackhawks players, an FL that is up to current standards, contains sufficient info about what a captain is and a summary of the team's captains. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove – The team's captains can easily be highlighted in List of Vancouver Canucks players, and the lead can be expanded to include information on captains. Most of the columns appear in the player list, with the exception of the seasons spent in the NHL, which isn't vitally important for a Canucks list. Most of the information is or could be in a larger list, causing the page to fail 3b. Giants2008 (17–14) 23:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I will merge some of the article into Vancouver Canucks, and some of the article into List of Vancouver Canucks players, so it would be nice if no one else does this before me. :D -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 23:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Agree with Giants2008 that captains can easily be highlighted in the players list. How's the merging process, SREKAL?--Crzycheetah 22:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I already thought of a plan, but I'll try to show it to you guys in my sandbox by Wednesday (which I'm guessing is the deadline) -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 03:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no deadline, although this is the 14th day of the nomination—meaning that it can be closed any time now—but if you could draft the merged version when you can (no hurry), that would be great. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Earliest would be tomorrow, or if I have time, today. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 04:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Already added the second and third paragraph into the main article, and asked User:Nurmsook to add more information into List of Vancouver Canucks players, since he was the FL nominator for the list, and I'm sure he can write a better lead than me. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 07:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Earliest would be tomorrow, or if I have time, today. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 04:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no deadline, although this is the 14th day of the nomination—meaning that it can be closed any time now—but if you could draft the merged version when you can (no hurry), that would be great. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.