Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Trinity Blood episodes/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by The Rambling Man 17:56, 14 November 2012 [1].

List of Trinity Blood episodes

Featured list candidates/List of Trinity Blood episodes/archive 1

Featured list removal candidates/List of Trinity Blood episodes/archive1

Notified: WikiProject Anime and manga

I am nominating this for featured list removal because there are several issues currently preventing it from being Wikipedia's finest work. A quick review revealed the following:

Eight [citation needed] tags. The page is delistable on this issue alone.
One dab link (Peter Cohen whose name is written Peter, Cohen for some reason).
I can't check all refs but certainly ref 22 leads to a search engine, nothing directly usable in this list, ref 23 links to a homepage of some site so can't be used to reference the info in this list.
EP# -> Episode number.
Can't see the table's meeting WP:ACCESS for row and col scopes.
There are TBAs which have been then for several years, can't they be resolved?
WP:DASH issues in the ref titles.
Lead is weak, it needs copyediting (e.g. what does "by the fourteen company .." mean?) and ought to at least introduce the reader to an overview of what Trinity Blood is all about.

The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, no longer meets requirements. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 21:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per the concerns by DragonZero. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, but not just yet. I've put some work into this since the nomination. The only thing I'm struggling with is the sources. Unfortunately, the European retailer's online shop has been offline for some sort of major upgrade over the past week or so and does not yet seem to be fully operational again. Good raise 14:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Still working on it. Proved to be more work than I anticipated, but I think I can manage it within a reasonable amount of time. Good raise 21:57, 25 September 2012 (UTC)~~[reply]

All issues raised have been addressed. Good raise 12:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on the work done to address the issues above. Well done. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 05:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Images needs to have alt text per WP:ALT

Even assuming WP:ALT still had guideline status, the one image used serves no purpose other than visual identification. Describing what it looks like would be wasting the listener's time.

"Consider adding more links to the article; per MOS:LINKS and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles"

Maybe it's just me, but I think the amount of links in this article is appropriate.

"As per MOS:DATES, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day".

Can't find a single occurrence of th in dates.

"Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: defense (A) (British: defence), realize (A) (British: realise), kerb (B) (American: curb), programme (B) (American: program )."

Can't find a single occurrence of British spelling.

"Don't" avoid contractions

Can't find a single occurrence of contractions.

TBr and ley 17:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. Good raise 04:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it meets criteria now. Good work! TBr and ley 05:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.