Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Church of England dioceses/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by Dabomb87 15:11, 2 July 2010 [1].
List of Church of England dioceses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: WikiProject Anglicanism, WikiProject Christianity
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails FL criteria 2 (not much of a lead and all) and has no inline cites. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The introduction is ten sentences and written in Summary style and seems adequate for the topic. A requirement for inline citations is not one of the criteria for featured lists, and seems unnecessary distraction to readers, as the data is not likely to be disputed. Therefore I would suggest keep. Although I would recommend citations be offered for the territories and years of foundation, that should not affect its Featured List award. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have merged several short paragraphs which really didn't need to be separate sections to create one decent length lead, and added a couple of inline citations - I'll work ont he latter further later...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:V. With regards, AnupamTalk 23:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's looking good now, though I'll wait to see if the coordinators have any issues with the article remaining an FL. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 06:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.