Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Bleach manga volumes/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Giants2008 18:36, 31 July 2011 [1].
List of Bleach manga volumes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga
I am nominating this for featured list removal because after most of is content was divided to sublist due to weight issues (the article was 104,623 bytes before the split. The article's sublists are List of Bleach chapters (1–187), List of Bleach chapters (188–367) and List of Bleach chapters (368–current) and I wonder whether they should also be reviewed. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: No DABs or dead links, although the lead image needs alt text. —WFC— 23:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Added.Tintor2 (talk) 02:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you should try sending the sub lists to FLC before sending the main list to FLRC. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I was recommended to send this one first. Don't know if I should cancel this anyway.Tintor2 (talk) 01:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Goodraise 06:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
More or less resolved comments by Goodraise
As for the procedure regarding the sublists. My suggestion is to tag them with the featured star for the moment and nominating them for reconfirmation FLRCs as well, as soon as this one is closed, especially since most of the original list's content is now part of those lists, not of this one. Goodraise 02:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Delist. The article is just an inch away from FL-quality, but it seems people would like to see this at FLC again (a pain I had hoped could be avoided). Fine by me. Goodraise 06:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - now this has been split into sublists and the information contained has been distributed across a few other lists, I believe this is now not much more than a navigational aid to the sublists. It seems unreasonable to keep the star based on a list that is now about 80% smaller than it was when it went through FLC. It shouldn't preclude a topic staying featured, as long as that's what the FT community agree to, but this is nothing like the list the one the community supported as featured. Note: that's all this process here is involved with, we have no jurisdiction or influence at other FLs or FTs in this particular FLRC. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. A consensus is needed now. I'd like to see the sublists attempt FL at some point though. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 23:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I also agree with The Rambling Man. This list shouldn't be an FL for the same reason hallways (usually) don't win architecture prizes. Bobnorwal (talk) 02:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.