Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/AJPW Triple Crown Heavyweight Championship/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by User:Matthewedwards 21:45, 30 October 2008 [1].
Notified: WikiProject Pro Wrestling
I am nominating this page because of the reliable sourcing criteria. Most of the sources the page relies on, "Shining Road", "PuroLove.com" and "TitleHistories.com" seem to be rather questionable. Some of these sources have been deemed unuseable on FAs, so why should it be any different here? -- Scorpion0422 20:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, the article could use much better sourcing, not to mention it is a combination of a list and a regular article. Sure it uses good grammer, but it needs to be split into 2 articles, AJPW Triple Crown Heavyweight Championship and List of AJPW Triple Crown Heavyweight Champions. If it is, I will nominate it a start class article. Altenhofen (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why would it need to be split? A list is supposed to be introduced with prose. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove unless sources are changed to reliable ones and some prose is added, if possible. iMatthew (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a note: it might be considered bad form to vote to delist an article from a project with which you have a current grudge. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems unwarranted. His recent contribs show edits to the project space and articles under the project's scope that don't show a "grudge". Even if there is one, AGF that he can separate it from identifying something that may not meet current FL criteria Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 23:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, leaning towards delist. I completely agree that Purolove.com is very questionable in terms of reliability. Shining Road, another source the article relies on fairly heavily, is a deadlink. My main concern, however, is the short lead. The leads in featured lists usually consist of a few paragraphs, nowadays. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.