Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Works of William Gibson

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 00:39, 29 January 2008.

Works of William Gibson

This page was originally split from the Bibliography section of the featured article candidate William Gibson, and has undergone a lot of work in the past few days to become, in my humble opinion, the most comprehensive, best-illustrated and well-referenced resource on the topic online. Any and all opinions and recommendations are welcome, but bear in mind this is my first aspirational featured list and it might take a little time to familiarise myself with the process. Skomorokh ^incite 04:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No objections then? Skomorokh ^incite 23:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The Victor Tsoi reference link is broken. --Orlady (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for catching that. Skomorokh ^incite 16:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Seems wonderfully complete, plus the prose is well-written and gives a good introduction/summary. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - though the sections for uncollected short fiction, articles, forewards, introductions, and afterwords, and miscellaneous are visually choppy and difficult to differentiate at first glance. Perhaps using dashes like in List of works by William Monahan would help fix that. Geraldk (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done I think this makes it easier to read, but I was not sure where to use the dashes exactly - I put them in the sections you mentioned, but do they belong elsewhere as well , for consistency's sake? Skomorokh ^confer 13:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with having it only in those sections, but other editors may have an opinion... Geraldk (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great images, great lead, well-written, good references, overall good job, only thing that could be fixed is what Geraldk said, but I still support.
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.