Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/WWE Backlash/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 21:17, 6 July 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Samgibbs (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it meets the FL criteria quite well. It is fully referenced and is presented and laid out to Wikipedia standards. Samgibbs (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose: Not a list article. It should be taken to GAN.--WillC 18:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Not a list.
Agree with Will, should be taken to Good Article Nominationsshould be taken to peer review. Bmg916Speak 18:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Oppose I also agree that this is not a list hoever I recommend it go to Peer review prior to submission to GAN. I think that the article needs a little more content and the wording needs to be tightened up a little. Some of the sections seem choppy. Also:
- I ran this article through AWB and made a small change to a reference.
- There are no DAB links.
- There are several dead links that generate 404 errors that need to be fixed. --Kumioko (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose it's an article and really needs work before being submitted for Good Article, I second the comment about "Peer Review", I've been helped greatly by it. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose This is not a list, and not ready to be featured to say the least. AfroGold - Afkatk 17:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowy Oppose/Close-Suggest withdrawal -- In this format, it is not a list nor does it meet WP:WIAFL. In addition, it suits better over at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, though it needs work.--Truco 503 00:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.