Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Usher discography/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 09:28, 24 September 2012 [1].
Usher discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Usher discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Usher discography/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Rayman95 (talk) 21:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because after doing many, many edits I feel that the discography has the potential of being an FL. Rayman95 (talk) 21:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You diffidently have my support, here are a few comments while reading:
- Link his self-titled debut album in the lead
Done.
- There is inconsistency in regards to endash "six-times" and "four times"
Done.
- RIAA certifications needs linking
Done.
- "2000 decade" ---> "2000s decade"
Done.
- "while the album's fourth and singles singles," typo found
Done.
- Another inconsistency found in regards to numbers "top-thirty" and "top-20"
Done.
- Hope this helps with the nomination and good luck, Jonatalk to me 18:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comments and support! Rayman95 (talk) 19:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome =) btw I created all of his albums and singles on Simple English Wikipedia based on your expansion on all of his articles. Best, Jonatalk to me 19:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comments and support! Rayman95 (talk) 19:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Done, removed hyphen.
Done, expanded.
Done.
Done, removed.
Removed, seeing how it didn't chart.
Moved to Usher videography, linked in the 'See also' section of the discography. It was requested by a user who thought the discography was too long.
Done.
Done.
Not sure what you mean. If it was the bolding then i've un-bolded the text.
Done.
|
Resolved comments from —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments: You've put a lot of effort into this list. May I offer my suggestions?
Removed sentence, as the music videos were moved to Usher videography.
Done, changed the sentence.
The ones that are linked more than once are the refs that use templates, so the publishers are automatically wiki-linked. I've gone through the refs extensively for overlinking, and besides my first point, could not see any.
Removed brackets.
|
- Support – after feedback from several reviewers, the article looks polished and ready for the bronze star. Good work. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 00:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I like how the article looks overall. The lead is comprehensive, well centered and referenced. The tables sortable and referenced. According to me, it looks good. Good job! — Tomica (talk) 16:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) Rayman95 (talk) 20:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Holiday56 (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from Holiday56
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
They were only released in the US. Other charting positions come from digital downloads from the respective countries. "Hey Daddy" has no information saying it charted in the UK on its main article, neither does "Lil Freak" in Canada. I changed "other singles" to "international singles" as this denotes that both "OMG" and "More" were released everywhere, including the US.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done, moved to lead artist section.
Done.
Done.
On its main article, it is noted as a "buzz single" so a promotional single. Also, on its album page Raymond v. Raymond it is not list as an official single.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
|
- Support. Holiday56 (talk) 06:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 03:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
TBrandley 01:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] I don't understand, could you be a bit more specific please. Rayman95 (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. |
- Support TBrandley 03:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.