Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Triple Gold Club
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 06:36, 21 February 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Oh boy, my first nom with this fancy new preload template. Anyway, sourced, WikiCup entry, will address concerns, etc. For those who may think the current table is too cluttered, there is a sample version that lists only the first year the player won that accomplishment here. Enjoy. -- Scorpion0422 16:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments by Rambo's Revenge (talk · contribs) |
---|
Comments from Rambo's Revenge (talk · contribs)
Otherwise I am impressed. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
Okay, my issues have been resolved, I won't support just yet because this nomination has only been open a short time and I'd prefer to wait to see if any other reviewers find a cause to object. Congrats for your excellent work. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, No major issues have been raised in the other reviews. I can now confidently support this nom. Well done. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments from Truco (talk · contribs) - Excellent list overall.
|
- Support - problems resolved to meet WP:WIAFL.--TRUCO 503 01:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as well presented, written and actually interestingly informative.Yobmod (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: I made some minor changes, but otherwise looks good! – Nurmsook! talk... 16:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
Thanks for taking a look. -- Scorpion0422 16:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.