Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tri Nations Series champions
Appearance
Hi, I recently starting working on these Tri Nations articles, and I feel this one is complete and is of FL standard. Thanks Cvene64 12:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Oppose for now - I believe {{Tri Nations Aggregate}} is not necessary and should be subst'ed. The lead is too short. The History and format sections are too short. Either expand or delete (after transfering to Tri Nations Series). Otherwise, good list. Renata 05:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree the template is not needed, as it is only used in this article, I have pasted the text in the article, the template can now be deleted. I have merged format and lead, as format relates to the article and should have probably been at the top originally. I have expanded history a little ->a few details about NZ/back-to-back titles and so on. Thanks for your comments. Is there anything else that can be done to get this to FL standard? Cvene64 05:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, I followed your example and merged the history to the intro. At least now intro is of decent length :) Renata 19:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- {{Tri Nations Aggregate}} IS used in another article — the All Blacks article — and potential could be included in the Wallabies and Springboks articles too.--GringoInChile 11:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support a decent list. Renata 19:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- That looks a lot better. Thanks. 00:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Conditional Support.The list doesn't mention how the points are awarded an table points calculated. If its too much for this article, just give wikilinks and you will get my support. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 07:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have expanded the second paragraph to explain the difference between For/Against points (the in-game score) and the table points (4 points for a win etc). I think I have fixed it up, but let me know if there is anything else that can be done to improve it. Cheers. 12:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well then. Now it would be Support. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Cvene64 03:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well then. Now it would be Support. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have expanded the second paragraph to explain the difference between For/Against points (the in-game score) and the table points (4 points for a win etc). I think I have fixed it up, but let me know if there is anything else that can be done to improve it. Cheers. 12:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support But dont delete the {{Tri Nations Aggregate}} template. --GringoInChile 11:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comments - Pretty good, but: the table is rather wide - can some pixels be saved, for example in the headings, to make it a bit narrower? There is also a bit of repetition in the headings ("Games x" "Games y" "Games z") that could be removed with some colspans. Could some visual interest be added (e.g. competition logo; flagicons for the teams/ countries?)? -- ALoan (Talk) 09:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- The headings/repetition has been fixed (with the help of Aloan). National flags have been used for the winners in the first table and the competition logo has been put in. Cvene64 00:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)