Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2019 Atlantic hurricane season/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Timeline of the 2019 Atlantic hurricane season

Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2019 Atlantic hurricane season/archive1

Nominator(s): Coding Cyclone ^{[citation needed]} 19:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because... This timeline of the 2019 Atlantic hurricane season was worked on by many different editors. Upon finding this list, I realized with the help of Drdpw that it is ready for an FLC. I will address all comments/concerns, but most of the work has been done by other editors. Thank you for your time. Coding Cyclone ^{[citation needed]} 19:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that this list is far from becoming an FL. I would not rate it anything above C. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. This is a good list, and the flaws are very few. I agree with Hurricane Noah: the article needs a little editing but otherwise looks good. ~ AC5230 talk 15:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support from Hurricane Noah

If you are going to mention Lorenzo in the lead with Dorian, you should explain what it did too. Noah^Talk 13:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing... add alt text for images. Noah^Talk 15:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Noah: I believe that these have all been addressed to the best of my abilities. CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 19:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

Notes 1 and 2 are identical so could be combined into one..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: I tried to do that, but for some reason when I open the editor it shows that they are the same note. For reference, I'm using the visual editor. CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 19:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: I'm sorry for pinging you again, but I just wanted to let you know: LightandDark2000 showed me another way to do it. The notes have now been merged. Thank you for your comments! CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 22:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I'll try to have a full look at the article later today........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"By convention, meteorologists one time zone" - think there's a word missing here
Last entry under September 23 is missing a full stop
First entry under October 2 randomly ends in a comma
That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: Hi there! Thank you for the comments. These have all been resolved. Your input is greatly appreciated. :) CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 23:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comments~~ Support from KN2731

Don't bold 2019 Atlantic hurricane season in the first sentence, according to MOS.
According to the description at Template:Main, it seems more appropriate to use {{broader|2019 Atlantic hurricane season}} instead of {{main|2019 Atlantic hurricane season}}.
Use en dashes for ranges instead of hyphens (e.g. 5–9 hurricanes).
Missing capital M in ref 8.
Perhaps mention which local time zones are used and where?
I feel like there could be more images or track maps in the body.

~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 06:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KN2731: Thank you for your comments! These are pieces of advice that I will certainly use in the future. The only one that I couldn't do was the one about time zones, since I can't find a source for that. If you do have something for that, feel free to tell me :) CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 03:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, moving to support. For the time zones I did find a graphic on page 3 of this but since the boundaries aren't explicitly mentioned it may be considered original research to mention them, so I won't push for its inclusion. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 12:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 19:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.