Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Timeline of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): NoahTalk 22:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it is now a complete timeline, documenting all the important events of the season. What a journey it has been with all of the articles in the 2018 Pacific hurricane season. I would like to thank Cyclonebiskit for all his help with this list as well. NoahTalk 22:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Great job with this! I just have a few comments:
That's all I've got! Great job with this, a timeline for such an active season is not an easy feat! (please ping me when it's done! :)) CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 20:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comments from LightandDark2000[edit]There are really a small handful of issues that I have been able to pick out, mostly involving the same issues. I think you did a phenomenal job here. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These are really the only issues that I have found. I think that CodingCyclone got the rest of them. This article is close to becoming a Featured List; it just needs some minor improvements before it's ready. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support - this is probably the best hurricane season timeline on Wikipedia. The references and details are on point, and the images are all public domain. Two tiny quips. One, 96C isn't in the timeline graphic at the top of "Timeline of events", which makes sense since it wasn't a proper tropical cyclone. Second, you should spell out PDT/CDT/MDT/HDT/MST/CST on their first usage, I think that's some rule on Wikipedia about spelling out acronyms. It could be confusing at the end that MST/CST aren't spelled out anywhere, and people might not realize that the acronym changed because of the dreaded daylight saving time. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I can add a note about the timezone switching due to DST. As for spelling out timezones:
Abbreviations for time zones (e.g. GMT and UTC) should not be written out in full in times.
NoahTalk 17:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for adding that note. Perfect. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I can add a note about the timezone switching due to DST. As for spelling out timezones:
- Comments
- "Throughout the season, 26 tropical depressions developed, 23 of which became tropical storms, 13 of them reached hurricane strength, and 10 achieved major hurricane intensity". This could do with breaking up into two sentences. It's also unclear if the 13 and 10 are subsets of the 23 or of the whole 26.
- Technically, it is a subset of both. 13/23 TSs became hurricanes and 13/26 TDs became hurricanes.
- "Several storms severy affected land" - "severely" spelt wrong
- Fixed. NoahTalk 14:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Should be fixed. NoahTalk 14:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – Pass
[edit]Doing soon. Aza24 (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Version reviewed: [2]
- Formatting
- Hmm I'm not sure about the authors for ref 1, it seems like they are references for the reference, so perhaps their inclusion is not necessary? With ref 1 as well, I believe the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory is the publisher, so should be under the parameter; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration feels unnecessary, what do you think?
- Removed the authors since they aren't listed directly at the source and changed the publisher. NoahTalk 02:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I recommend removing "Miami, Florida" from ref 5 as its the only time you use a location
- Reliability
- First class sourcing—the tweet is less than ideal, but seems perfectly fine in the places it's used
- Verifiability
- I'm not sure ref 4 is going to the correct link? Should probably mark it as dead
- Actually, appears this is an older version of ref one so I just replaced it. NoahTalk 02:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The rest looks good
- @Aza24: I think that should be it. NoahTalk 03:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks great, pass for source review Aza24 (talk) 03:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 02:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.