Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Theodore Sturgeon Award/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 00:09, 26 January 2013 [1].
Theodore Sturgeon Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): PresN 00:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey all, back again. Switching off from video games back to SF fiction award lists, we have here the Theodore Sturgeon award- given for science fiction short stories published in English anywhere in the world in the prior year. Not as well known, perhaps as the Hugo or Nebula awards, but bears the distinction that unlike those awards, the Sturgeon (and its novel counterpart, the Campbell) is decided not by a vote among fans or American SF authors, but by a small panel of the kind of SF authors who have Wikipedia articles. The format is, of course, pretty much identical to all of the prior dozens of SF lists I've put through here, and hopefully I've remembered to include all of the comments and suggestions made in prior FLCs. Thank you all very much for reviewing! --PresN 00:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
NapHit (talk) 05:14, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Excellent work as always by PresN! NapHit (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Crisco 1492 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Crisco 1492
|
- Support on prose. Image is still up for deletion, but would be valid for FU — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Otherwise, excellent as ever. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Good work. — ΛΧΣ21 20:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick comment – It looks like the image mentioned above has been deleted. This has left a red link to the photo in the infobox; if the image is not brought back under fair use, this link should be taken out. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.